A Cabanga Africa Publication

Africa Thinks Here

On-the-ground business intelligence in Namibia, since July 2019.

Paying for Molecules: How Cleanergy Funds a First Pilot Without a Fund

February 22, 2022
Paying for Molecules: How Cleanergy Funds a First Pilot Without a Fund

By Dhiladhila Magazine · Issue 03

The mega-projects wait on blended-finance vehicles. Cleanergy is being paid for the old-fashioned way, off two balance sheets.

Most of Namibia’s green-hydrogen story is a financing story – concessional funds, development banks and instruments still being assembled. The Cleanergy pilot is the exception. Launched at Walvis Bay in February 2022 and costed at roughly N$270 million (US$18 million), it is funded by two operating companies rather than a fund.

That distinction matters for anyone tracking how the sector will actually be paid for. Ohlthaver & List and CMB.TECH are putting corporate equity into a demonstration asset, taking first-of-a-kind risk themselves so that later, larger capital can price the thing against a working plant.

Corporate equity before catalytic capital

The pilot’s capital model is unfashionably simple. Two firms with cash flow from other businesses fund a demonstration plant directly, without waiting for a syndicate, a guarantee or a concessional tranche. It is the sort of spend a diversified group can make when it wants an option on a new industry.

The advantage is speed and control; the limit is size. Balance-sheet equity can build one pilot, but it cannot fund the export-scale plants Namibia talks about, which will need the very finance vehicles this pilot is meant to de-risk.

A pilot can ride on corporate equity; an industry cannot, and both facts sit inside this one.

De-risking is the financial product

What the pilot really manufactures, in money terms, is evidence. Lenders and funds price green hydrogen at a premium today because no local plant has run, no local off-take has been signed, and no local cost curve has been observed. A working demonstration replaces each unknown with a number.

That is why a US$18 million spend can matter out of proportion to its size. It is early-stage capital doing what early-stage capital does – buying down the uncertainty that keeps cheaper money on the sidelines.

The pilot’s return is not a molecule but a lower risk premium for everything built after it.

Turning a fuel into a billable product

A financier looks past the plant to the receipts. For hydrogen to be bankable it has to be sold like any metered utility: measured by the kilogram, invoiced against a contract, and paid through a channel that leaves a record. A fuel with no billing rail is not yet an asset a lender can lend against.

The pilot is where those rails get built. Selling hydrogen to a mine’s truck fleet or to the railways means metering dispensed fuel and settling on terms, and Namibia’s spread of card and mobile payment gives the technical means to charge for it.

None of that plumbing exists until a real plant dispenses a real molecule to a paying buyer. The demonstration is therefore also a payments pilot – the first place a Namibian hydrogen sale is metered, priced and reconciled, which is exactly the transaction record a bank will later want to see.

Bankability starts the day the first kilogram is metered and invoiced, not the day it is produced.

What the money proves

If the pilot works, its financial legacy is a template: an observed cost, a signed off-take, and a billing method that a fund or a development bank can underwrite at scale. Those are the documents that turn Namibia’s cheap sunlight into a financeable pipeline rather than a slogan.

The risk is that corporate patience runs shorter than the industry needs. Equity holders expect a path to return, and if off-take is slow to materialise, the very balance-sheet model that built the pilot could hesitate to fund the next step.

Patient equity opened the door; whether it stays patient decides who walks through it.

For a banker, a fund manager or a development financier, the Cleanergy pilot is less an energy asset than a data-generation exercise that will price everything downstream. The decision it frames is whether to engage now – shaping the off-take contracts and payment rails while they are being invented – or to wait for the numbers and pay more for the certainty later.

Sources: Ohlthaver & List; Green hydrogen (Online Guide to the Namibian Economy); Cleanergy Namibia project overview

By The Dhiladhila Desk

More From This Section