A Cabanga Africa Publication

Africa Thinks Here

On-the-ground business intelligence in Namibia, since July 2019.

Collecting on Its Own: The Fiscal Bet Behind Namibia’s New Revenue Agency

April 7, 2021
Collecting on Its Own: The Fiscal Bet Behind Namibia's New Revenue Agency

By Dhiladhila Magazine · Issue 08

Namibia has moved tax and customs out of the finance ministry into a standalone agency. The wager is that a dedicated collector can raise more at home.

On 7 April 2021 in Windhoek, Namibia took tax and customs collection out of the Ministry of Finance and handed it to a standalone institution. The Namibia Revenue Agency, operating under the Namibia Revenue Agency Act of 2017 and led by founding Commissioner Sam Shivute, absorbed the old Inland Revenue and Customs and Excise directorates and, in the state’s own framing, became the country’s first autonomous revenue administration.

The move is less about paperwork than about arithmetic. Namibia leans heavily on a shared regional customs pool whose payouts swing with trade it does not control, and the pandemic had just shown how quickly that support can thin. Building a dedicated collector is the fiscal answer to a plain problem: the country needs to raise more of its own revenue, more reliably, from inside its own borders.

A budget that leans on a shared pool

For decades a fifth to a third of the national budget has arrived through the Southern African Customs Union, the pool that shares regional trade duties among its members. It is real money, and it is largely unearned at home, which makes it both a cushion and a risk. When regional trade slows the transfer shrinks, and a government that has planned around it is left short through no fault of its own tax base.

That dependence is the backdrop to NamRA. An agency built to lift domestic collection is, in part, an attempt to reduce how much the budget rides on a figure decided by regional trade and a shared formula. The customs union will keep paying, but the wager is that a sharper collector can make the country a little less hostage to it.

The customs pool is a cushion the state does not control, and cushions can deflate.

Why domestic collection had to rise

The domestic picture gave the reform its urgency. Namibia’s tax take had hovered near a fifth of gross domestic product, and the economy had contracted sharply in 2020 as the pandemic struck, with nominal output around N$174.9 billion, roughly US$11 billion. A shrinking economy narrows the tax base at the very moment the state needs more revenue to service debt and hold its spending.

Against that, the government could either raise rates on an already-strained base or collect more efficiently from the base it has. NamRA is a bet on the second path. Firmer enforcement, fewer leakages and tighter customs control are meant to widen the take without simply lifting the headline rates that businesses and households already feel.

Where the base is thin, the gain has to come from collection, not higher rates.

What autonomy is supposed to buy

The point of a semi-autonomous agency is distance. Freed from the civil-service pay scale and staffing rules, NamRA can in principle recruit and hold the auditors, data analysts and customs specialists a ministry directorate struggled to keep. Ring-fenced funding and operational independence are meant to insulate day-to-day collection from political pressure over who gets audited and who does not.

Commissioner Shivute has framed the agency as one that will apply the law without fear or favour while trying not to be seen as a threat to livelihoods. That balance, firm enforcement alongside fair treatment, is the reputational tightrope every new revenue authority walks in its first year, and it is easier to promise than to hold.

Autonomy is meant to buy skill and distance; both are harder to keep than to grant.

The measure that matters

The honest test of NamRA is not that it exists but that it collects more, more cheaply, than the directorates it replaced. Revenue as a share of the economy, the cost of collecting each dollar, and the gap between tax owed and tax paid are the numbers that will tell the story. A new name on the same performance would prove nothing at all.

That verdict will take years, and the early period carries a specific risk. A collector under pressure to show results fast can lean hardest on the compliant firms it can already see, rather than on the larger informal economy it cannot. Widening the net is slower work than squeezing what is already visible.

The agency earns its keep by collection efficiency, not by its founding.

For a business owner or investor reading the 2021 signal, NamRA marks a state that means to collect more of what it is owed, and to do it with a dedicated, better-resourced hand. The decision it puts on the table is whether to get compliance in order now, ahead of firmer audits and tighter customs, or to wait and test how hard a new and ambitious collector is willing to push.

Sources: The Namibian; Revenue Statistics in Africa: Namibia (OECD); Namibia member state (SACU); Namibia Quarterly Economic Review Q1 2021 (IPPR)

By The Dhiladhila Desk

More From This Section